Even supposing that society is more inhuman than
in the past, when socialised medicine
and unemployment benefits
didn't yet exist, why would this give rise
to depression rather than anxiety, fatigue,
'nervous breakdown' or just plain anger?
Alain Ehrenberg, a sociologist, attempts to answer
this question in La Fatigue d'être soi.
Retracing in detail the history of depression
since the 1950s (mainly in France),
he shows very well how it ceased to be
defined in terms of psychic pain, and came
to be perceived more and more as
a pathology of action. The new 'déprimé' lacks energy,
is unable to 'perform', is inhibited in
his work and his relationships with others.
He suffers, the psychiatrists say,
from 'psychomotor retardation'.
And this new pathology emerges, as if by chance
, in a society which values individual
responsibility and initiative above all else.
Just as Freudian neuroses were
the pathology of a subject defined by prohibition
and internal conflict, so contemporary depression is
"the reverse of the sovereign individual,
of the man who believes himself to be
the author of his own life".
In that sense, depression is not
directly provoked or caused by
contemporary society.
Rather, Ehrenberg suggests,
it is the negative 'counterpart' to
the subjectivity created
and so highly valued in this society.
No comments:
Post a Comment