Showing posts with label Marriage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marriage. Show all posts

Sunday, February 14, 2010

Peter Handke, a Rapsody and A Variation of an Incestuos Little Night Music

drawing by marguerita


The German word “Einfall,” meaning a sudden notion or fancy,
contains the image of something dropping precipitously into the mind.

Don Juan, in this whimsical tour de force by the Austrian writer Peter Handke, is not a man but an Einfall, and the mind into which he drops, with a crash, is that of a French innkeeper and chef who (unlike the world-renowned Handke) has lost his customers and is living in solitude.
Pretty soon the Einfall develops into a full-fledged idea.
But what is it? The book’s epigraph quotes Da Ponte andMozart’s
Don Giovanni: “Chi son’ io tu non saprai” —

“Who I am, you shall not discover.”

Perhaps, but I will hazard a guess: Handke’s Don Juan personifies the idea of the fulfilled moment, where time and eternity intersect.





Sunday, January 31, 2010

Food for Thought: Roti du Porc au Lait

drawing by marguerita


Rub the pork with salt and pepper.
Act XXV

Apigollo- You got it the wrong way!
How it is easy to get you so raged....

Daisy- Ooooooooh

Apigollo -You do not understand what I am saying !

Daisy - I attended an extraordinary vinegar tasting today.
Even on a cold blistery day an eventful evening .At last I was courted
by few interesting gentlemen,while also putting on my horny lips some green Sicilian olives. Wished you were there,but hell,you cannot understand.......

"Qu'il soit farci ou non, le cochon de lait est toujours rôti entier; le point essentiel est de conduire la cuisson de façon à ce qu'elle soit au point lorsque la peau est devenue croustillante et dorée. La durée de la cuisson varie entre une heure et demie et 2 heures pour un cochon de lait de poids moyen. S'il est farci, ce temps est augmenté d'un quart d'heure par livre de farce. Il doit être arrosé de préférence avec de l'huile pendant sa cuisson; cet élément permettant d'obtenir la peau plus croustillante que par l'emploi de tout autre corps gras. En même temps que la pièce, on sert toujours une saucière de bon Jus."

Auguste Escoffier- Le guide culinaire

http://chefsimon.com/cochon-de-lait.html



http://events.nytimes.com/recipes/8052/1988/08/28/Roti-De-Porc-Au-Lait-Roast-Pork-With-Milk/recipe.html
l

Friday, January 29, 2010

Eliot Spitzer: The Nouvelle Ovid and His Ars Amatoria

drawing by marguerita

As he continues his attempts at a redemption tour, Eliot Spitzer recently opined on what love is -- drifting into slightly uncomfortable personal territory.

Siquis in hoc artem populo non novit amandi,
Hoc legat et lecto carmine doctus amet.
Arte citae veloque rates remoque moventur,
Arte leves currus: arte regendus amor.
Curribus Automedon lentisque erat aptus habenis,
5
Tiphys in Haemonia puppe magister erat:
Me Venus artificem tenero praefecit Amori;
Tiphys et Automedon dicar Amoris ego.
Ille quidem ferus est et qui mihi saepe repugnet:
Sed puer est, aetas mollis et apta regi.
10
Phillyrides puerum cithara perfecit Achillem,
Atque animos placida contudit arte feros.
Qui totiens socios, totiens exterruit hostes,
Creditur annosum pertimuisse senem.

Ovid-

"It’s one of these feelings that you sense when you meet somebody and there is a response that is different and is unique, and is palpable. And it then changes over time," Spitzer, who resigned the governor's seat in 2008 after he was snared as a client of a high-priced call girl ring, said in a wide-ranging interview posted on the Web site bigthink.com.

"In other words, the sort of exaltation of first meeting and falling in love is, I think everybody would admit, is different than the feelings that you might have after 25 years," he said, laughing as he added, "When my wife is watching this, she may say, 'What are you talking about?' But it is."

"What I've tried to do is look within," he said. "That is where one must ultimately find one's sense of self and purpose. That's all one can do."

Spitzer said: "when you know something is stupid, don't do it."

He described it as a combination of "entitlement", "hubris" and "adrenaline" that causes some people to self-implode."To the extent that they are legitimate and justified, you've got to just accept that and move on," he said. "You can't try to deny reality sometimes. That's part of maturing and growing up.

"It's the stupidity that brings people down," he said.


http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/knickerbocker/spizter_offers_his_definition_of_7p0dsI5zM97FJMlalhCi6O

in English

Book I Part I: His Task

Should anyone here not know the art of love,

read this, and learn by reading how to love.

By art the boat’s set gliding, with oar and sail,

by art the chariot’s swift: love’s ruled by art.

Automedon was skilled with Achilles’s chariot reins,

Tiphys in Thessaly was steersman of the Argo,

Venus appointed me as guide to gentle Love:

I’ll be known as Love’s Tiphys, and Automedon.

It’s true Love’s wild, and one who often flouts me:

but he’s a child of tender years, fit to be ruled.

Chiron made the young Achilles perfect at the lyre,

and tempered his wild spirits through peaceful art.

He, who so terrified his enemies and friends,

they say he greatly feared the aged Centaur.

That hand that Hector was destined to know,

was held out, at his master’s orders, to be flogged.

I am Love’s teacher as Chiron was Achilles’s,

both wild boys, both children of a goddess.

Yet the bullock’s neck is bowed beneath the yoke,

and the spirited horse’s teeth worn by the bit.

And Love will yield to me, though with his bow

he wounds my heart, shakes at me his burning torch.

The more he pierces me, the more violently he burns me,

so much the fitter am I to avenge the wounds.

Nor will I falsely say you gave me the art, Apollo,

no voice from a heavenly bird gives me advice,

I never caught sight of Clio or Clio’s sisters

while herding the flocks, Ascra, in your valleys:

Experience prompts this work: listen to the expert poet:

I sing true: Venus, help my venture!

Far away from here, you badges of modesty,

the thin headband, the ankle-covering dress.

I sing of safe love, permissible intrigue,

and there’ll be nothing sinful in my song.

Now the first task for you who come as a raw recruit

is to find out who you might wish to love.

The next task is to make sure that she likes you:

the third, to see to it that the love will last.

That’s my aim, that’s the ground my chariot will cover:

that’s the post my thundering wheels will scrape.

About Ovid:Publius Ovidius Naso (20 March 43 BCE – 17 or 18 CE), known as Ovid in the English-speaking world, was a Roman poet who is best known as the author of the Heroides, Amores, and Ars Amatoria, three major collections of erotic poetry, the Metamorphoses a mythological hexameter poem, the Fasti, about the Roman calendar, and the Tristia and Epistulae ex Ponto, two collections of poems written in exile on the Black Sea. Ovid was also the author of several smaller pieces, theRemedia Amoris, the Medicamina Faciei Femineae, and the Ibis, a long curse-poem. He also authored a lost tragedy, Medea. He is considered a master of the elegiac couplet, and is traditionally ranked alongside Virgil and Horace as one of the three canonic poets of Latin literature. The scholar Quintilian considered him the last of the canonical Latin love elegists.[1] His poetry, much imitated during Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages, decisively influenced European art andliterature and remains as one of the most important sources of classical mythology.[2]















Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Happiness in life: III to love and be loved

drawing by marguerita


There are two cases, other minds and one's own.

Mill discusses both in the Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy (Ch. XII, Appendix).

A phoenix is a mythical bird with a colorful plumage and a tail of gold and scarlet (or purple, blue, and green according to some legends). It has a 500 to 1,000 year life-cycle, near the end of which it builds itself a nest of twigs that then ignites; both nest and bird burn fiercely and are reduced to ashes, from which a new, young phoenix or phoenix egg arises, reborn anew to live again. The new phoenix is destined to live as long as its old self. In some stories, the new phoenix embalms the ashes of its old self in an egg made of myrrh and deposits it in the Egyptian city of Heliopolis (sun city in Greek). It is said that the bird's cry is that of a beautiful song. In very few stories they are able to change into humans....

.Among the bodies to which one refers one's sensations, there is one that is as it were peculiar.
That is, one stands in a peculiar relationship to it.
One is aware of it from the inside. For this body alone one is aware of kinesthetic sensations. One's perceivings locate other bodies at a distance to this one.
Our motives and volitions move this body directly in ways that they can move no other body.
Mill's view is that one has as a matter of fact this special relation to one's own body; it largely determines one's identity as a person.
Nonetheless, mental events and bodily events are distinct sorts of events in the world of phenomena.
There is no problem created by this distinction, however, compared to the problems raised by the similar Cartesian dichotomy. For, where Descartes has substances and a rationalist account of causation with objective necessary connections, with no such connections, and therefore no causation, between distinct sorts of substances (such as mind and body), Mill has no substances—they are foreign to his empiricism—and his view of causation is the regularity view of the empiricists. There are regularities in the mind-body connection—regularly when I will my arm to go up, it goes up—and so the Cartesian problems disappear.
His views on the centrality of one's awareness of one's own body to one's being nd to one's being in the world are closer to those of Merleau-Ponty than they are to those of Descartes.
Now, there are regularities that connect outward actions of one's body with states of consciousness within that body. These would include patterns such as this: “Whenever my arm goes up there is a consciousness of my body from the inside that contains a willing that my arm go up.” These regularities are verified in one's own case. But they can be used to infer the existence of conscious states within other bodies that exhibit the same outward actions as one's own body. Thus, whenever I observe the arm of another going up I can infer that there is a consciousness of that body from the inside that contains a volition that the arm go up. The regularities that obtain in one's own case render the existence of such conscious states in others conditional certainties.
The inference to other minds is thus perfectly reasonable. It is based on two facts, one the peculiar relationship that one's own conscious states have to one's body and the regularities that obtain in one's own experience between one's own conscious states and one’ body.
The former accounts for the privacy of conscious states, the latter justifies the inference to the presence of similar private states in others.It is worth noting that many have suggested that our knowledge of other minds is based on an argument from analogy.
On Mill's view this is not so. The inference is a simple causal inference. Nor is it an inference based on a single case. To be sure, the regularities are verified in one's own case, but the facts that verify them are the repeated instances that they describe. Nor is privacy a problem.
When I infer from a bodily state to the presence of another mind, the consciousness to which I infer is an awareness of that body from the inside. Since I am aware of only my own body from the inside and not that of any other, I should expect to consciousness to which I infer to be private to the other person.
As for the problem of mind in one's own case, this is more difficult. What is mind?
Matter is resolved by Mill into a lawfully related bundle of sensations including many permanent possibilities of sensation. Can one's own mind similarly be resolved into a bundle of feelings with a background of permanent possibilities? The problem is that when I expect or remember a state of consciousness I do not simply believe that is has or will exist; it is also to believe that I myself have experienced or will experience that state of consciousness.
If it is a series or bundle then it is a series or bundle in which a part of the bundle is conscious of the whole. This had been an objection to the bundle view ever since Plotinus used it against the Epicureans. Mill simply accepts the reality of such awareness. If we accept the bundle view, rejecting the common view of mind as a substance, as he thinks we must, then we are reduced to “accepting the paradox that something which ex hypothesi is but a series of feelings, can be aware of itself as a series” (Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy, Ch. XII, p. 194). He thus sees himself as driven to “ascribe a reality to the Ego—to my own Mind—different from that real existence as a Permanent Possibility, which is the only reality I acknowledge in Matter” (ibid.).

John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), British philosopher, economist, moral and political theorist, and administrator, was the most influential English-speaking philosopher of the nineteenth century. His views are of continuing significance, and are generally recognized to be among the deepest and certainly the most effective defenses of empiricism and of a liberal political view of society and culture. The overall aim of his philosophy is to develop a positive view of the universe and the place of humans in it, one which contributes to the progress of human knowledge, individual freedom and human well-being. His views are not entirely original, having their roots in the British empiricism of John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume, and in the utilitarianism of Jeremy Bentham. But he gave them a new depth, and his formulations were sufficiently articulate to gain for them a continuing influence among a broad public.






    Saturday, January 9, 2010

    Marklliver Travels d'apres Swift:An Essay for an Absurdian Play

    drawing /collage by marguerita


    Marklliver’s adventure in L'Express begins when he wakes after his marriage wrecks to find himself bound by innumerable tiny threads and addressed by tiny captors who are in awe of him but fiercely protective of their kingdom. They are not afraid to use violence against Marklliver, though their arrows are little more than pricks.
    But overall, they are hospitable, risking famine in their land by feeding Marklliver, who consumes more food than a thousand L"Expresstians combined could.
    Marklliver is taken into the capital city by a vast wagon the L'Expresstians have specially built.

    Characters:

    Marklliver,he drinks too much,so we wonder about his mind and liver.
    Has a hard time digesting humor,but likes angulas and zuchini.
    Sometimes on alternate hollywoods he thinks and drives like Al Pacino in his Lamborghini,
    in the movie.In fact ,he leans,more towards Berlusconi,before the Duomo's accident.
    He will feel humiliated when faced with truth,but not concerned about humiliating someone who cares for him.An Omelet,instead of Hamlet.

    The Made in Heaven producer gets kicked out and is in a funk.She has a very complex lifestyle.
    Younger men,older men,one west,one East,likes to meddle where she has no business,kind of kitschy.strange. Makes wrong assessments about private lives and has no style,sense of understanding or knowing someone before opening her taco taco mouth.
    She is like a character out of The Witches of Salem.Talks too much and says nothing.

    The other one,is a Tea Hot Boiling Water Psychic Guru, with Money as the only reason for living and how to menace the lives of Marklliver's family.

    And the Pursuing Weirdo, a frustrated wannabe,after a tv reality show,while posing as a wino expert,who cannot get neither a boyfriend or a girlfriend.

    Marklliver is introduced to the emperor, who is entertained by Marklliver, just as Marklliver is flattered by the attention of royalty. Eventually Marklliver becomes a national resource, used by the army in its war against the people of Blefuscu, whom the L'Expresstians hate for doctrinal differences concerning the proper way to crack eggs.
    But things change when Marklliver is convicted for not providing his wife and causing her to be pushed out of her royal palace because of his urine and he is condemned to be shot in the eyes and starved to death, unless the Special Spirits are able to clean his head.

    Sunday, November 23, 2008

    Attention : "Two shall become one flesh" also spracht Solomon

    collage by marguerita
    Keep it going.
    Sometimes he reclined on the paisley coverlet while flipping through a Bible, emphasizing his point that it is time for the church to put God back in the bed.
    “Today we’re beginning this sexperiment, seven days of sex,” he said, with his characteristic mix of humor, showmanship and Scripture.
    “How to move from whining about the economy to whoopee!”

    We should try to double up the amount of intimacy we have in marriage. And when I say intimacy,
    I don’t mean holding hands in the park or a back rub.”
    “If you’ve said, ‘I do,’ do it,” he said.
    As for single people,
    “I don’t know, try eating chocolate cake,” he said.

    Just look at the sensuousness of the Song of Solomon, or Genesis: “two shall become one flesh,”
    or Corinthians:
    “do not deprive each other of sexual relations.”

    “God thought it up, it was his idea.”Texas Pastor's Advice for Better Marriage - More Sex, More Often - NYTimes.com